Skip to main content

California reviews whether Tesla's self-driving tests require regulatory oversight

But the agency is “revisiting that decision following recent software updates, videos showing a dangerous use of that technology, open investigations by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), and the opinions of other experts,” the department said in a letter on Friday to Lena Gonzalez, chair of the state Senate Transportation Committee.

The Los Angeles Times first reported the letter.

Tesla did not respond to a request for comment.

The electric car company has been expanding the rollout of what it describes as the “beta” of its advanced driver assistant software, FSD, sparking safety concerns by effectively allowing untrained drivers to test how well the technology works on public roads.

Critics say Tesla was able to avoid state regulatory oversight by telling the Department of Motor Vehicles that its FSD features do not make its cars autonomous.

The department said it has notified Tesla that it “will be initiating further review of the technology of their vehicles, including any expansion of the current programs or features.”

“If the capabilities of the features meet the definition of an autonomous vehicle according to California law and regulations, DMV will take steps to make certain that Tesla operates under the appropriate autonomous vehicle permits,” the agency said in a statement.

Under the regulation, Tesla would need to report crashes and traffic tickets specific to the FSD, said Phil Koopman, a professor at Carnegie Mellon University in Pennsylvania.

This would also “trigger a driver background check to ensure (a) good driving record,” he said.

Currently, regulations cover companies like Alphabet Inc and General Motors Co, which are testing autonomous vehicle technology on public roads in California.

The FSD allows vehicles to perform some driving tasks such as lane changes, but Tesla says the features “require a fully attentive driver.” Still, Tesla markets the technology as “full self-driving” and charges up to $10,000 for the software.

The DMV also said its review of Tesla’s use of the term “full self-driving” is continuing.

“The DMV shares the concern held by many other safety stakeholders about the potential for driver inattention, misunderstanding, or misuse as these systems become more prevalent,” it said.

(Reporting by Hyunjoo Jin in San Francisco, Jaiveer Singh Shekhawat in Bengaluru; Editing by Shounak Dasgupta and Jonathan Oatis)

Source

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Moonshots, on Saturn Network!

They can’t quarantine your mind Saturn.Network is more than a Crypto exchange, first it operates on both the Ethereum and Ethereum Classic chains. They also specialize in free airdrops, and offer 0% on all maker orders. The network also has a wallet web extension, one that I’ve used with Brave browser . It looks like a clone of meta mask, though upgraded recently to look less so. It seamlessly switches between ETH, ETC and Tomo chains. Double check gas prices when switching between them, ETC uses much less but can get stuck on ETH settings. Being on, two chainz, means two native tokens, Saturn ETH DAO and Saturn Classic DAO . Both tokens entitle holders to a share of their Saturn network traffic, and airdrops. The exchange offers airdrops and tools for tokens to do airdrops. I check my wallet on the airdrop function, to see what I can claim. There’s generally something new every month or two. The selection of tokens is unique and eclectic. Made up of deflationary, other exchange, sca...

Fed's Bullard sees four U

(Reuters) – St. Louis Federal Reserve Bank President James Bullard on Wednesday upped his view of how fast the U.S. central bank should tighten monetary policy, saying he now believes four interest rate hikes may be in the cards this year. “I actually now think we should maybe go to four hikes in 2022,” Bullard told the Wall Street Journal in an interview. (Reporting by Ann Saphir) Source

Long Term Update: 2022 Outlook with entropic methods

Every year i post an outlook using entropic methods explained in the technical section of this blog. Here you can find the 2015 , 2016,   2017,   2018, 2019, 2020 and 2021  forecast update, where you can find more information about this approach. Updated values for bitcoin (in brackets values of last year) using daily data since August 2010 (average data of 4 main exchanges when possible) .    BTC/USD Growth Factor G 1.00130 (1.00104) Shannon Probability P (see this as entropy ) 0.5254 (0.5232) Root mean square RMS (see this as volatility) 0.049 (0.055) Bitcoin’s entropic values versus the Usd improved during 2021,  the Growth Factor (G) grow to 1.00130% compounded daily or 160% yearly, higher then 1y ago. The optimal fraction of your total wealth to invest in bitcoin rised to 5.1%  (~0.5254*2=1.051 – 1 = 0.051 or 5.1% roundable to 5%). Volatility continues to drop year after year and that’s normal as bitcoin gets bigger and bigger so less prone to volatility. The BTCUSD growth fac...